http://nexthttp.com/2005/09/19/geeking-out/ Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:20:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://nexthttp.com/2005/09/19/geeking-out/comment-page-1/#comment-36 Susan Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:48:30 +0000 http://www.nexthttp.com/blog/?p=325#comment-36 You should make a wiki page... heh, heh. You should make a wiki page… heh, heh.

]]> http://nexthttp.com/2005/09/19/geeking-out/comment-page-1/#comment-35 Vid Wed, 21 Sep 2005 01:42:08 +0000 http://www.nexthttp.com/blog/?p=325#comment-35 Nothing wrong with inventing a word so long as you admit you've invented it. Nothing wrong with inventing a word so long as you admit you’ve invented it.

]]> http://nexthttp.com/2005/09/19/geeking-out/comment-page-1/#comment-34 Joseph Tue, 20 Sep 2005 07:11:38 +0000 http://www.nexthttp.com/blog/?p=325#comment-34 <em>Beplussed</em> is like <em>bespectacled</em>. HFS+ has had the the plus sign tacked on to it, thus it is beplussed. It isn't simply <em>plussed</em>, because that is the little kid way of saying <em>added</em> (like <em>minused</em> instead of <em>subtracted</em>). It is also possibly the opposite of <em>nonplussed</em>. Beplussed is like bespectacled. HFS+ has had the the plus sign tacked on to it, thus it is beplussed. It isn’t simply plussed, because that is the little kid way of saying added (like minused instead of subtracted). It is also possibly the opposite of nonplussed.

]]> http://nexthttp.com/2005/09/19/geeking-out/comment-page-1/#comment-33 Susan Tue, 20 Sep 2005 06:15:43 +0000 http://www.nexthttp.com/blog/?p=325#comment-33 Hmm...could be because "<a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=%20beplussed" rel="nofollow">beplussed</a>" isn't a word. Unless you'd like to provide me with a definition? Hmm…could be because “beplussed” isn’t a word. Unless you’d like to provide me with a definition?

]]>